VirtualBox

I’ve been trying to work with multiple Operating Systems and I found that dual or triple boot was not very easy to use,especially when you need concurrent access to multiple Operating Sytems.

I had Microsoft’s Virtual PC, which for the uninformed is a virtualization software, which aims at concurrent use of multiple Operating systems. I had an evaluation version of Windows Vista Enterprise, which I had downloaded from the Microsoft Download Center, installed on Virtual PC.

For installing Vista, it took around 10 GB of disk space, which was further converted into a Virual Hard Disk ย with the .vhd extension. If you have Windows XP SP2 as the Host OS, and you plan to install Vista as the Guest OS, Virtual PC takes around 768 MB of memory for the Guest Operating System.

I planned to install Ubuntu 8.04 on Virtual PC and met with little success. That is when I came across Sun Microsystems’ Virtualization software called VirtualBox. You can download the latest version of VirtualBox (Version 3.0.4) from here.

I installed Ubuntu 8.04 using VirtualBox on my PC. Earlier, I tried to install Ubuntu 8.04 on a separate partition on my PC, but tasted failure while trying to configure the Internet connection. One of my friends, Vinay downloaded Ubuntu 9.04 (the latest version) and did not face any problem connecting to the Internet. Because, Ubuntu 9.04 was configured to connect to the Internet with little user intervention.

Downloading Ubuntu 9.04 would be such a daunting task. So, I used VirtualBox and the Internet was automatically configured for Ubuntu 8.04.

The network connectivity for VirtualBox is a little different from other Virtualization softwares. While VMWare workstation and Microsoft’s Virtual PC used shared network connectivity and connect to the internet using the IP address of the Host Operating System, VirtualBox connects to the internet with a different IP address, at the same time using NAT interface for networking, like the other Virtualization softwares.

VirtualBox actually creates a special bridge connection for the Guest OS. Further more, VirtualBox is the first Open Source Virtualization software. Even though the shared folders option is available in VirtualBox, it still lacks the Drag & Drop functionality between the Guest OS and the Host OS, that is available on Virtual PC and VMWare workstation.

Here’s a screenshot ofย Windows Server 2008 running on VirtualBox installed in my PC .

Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox

Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox

I have 4 Operating Systems in my PC, excluding the Host OS(Windows XP SP2)

  1. Ubuntu 8.04
  2. Windows Vista Ultimate (32 – bit)
  3. Windows XP SP2 (For testing purposes)
  4. Windows Server 2008 Standard

I’ve also planned to install Solaris OS, but I’ll be using VMWare for that. Besides installing Solaris, I’ll also be installing Windows 7 RC.

And I’ve reached the end of my first full fledged post. Do post your comments and queries, if you have any.

Have fun ๐Ÿ™‚

Advertisements

About Manikandan Surendren

A PeopleSoft Techno-functional Consultant. An engineering graduate in Computer Science. Technology Enthusiast. Movie freak. Gadget geek.
This entry was posted in Virtualization. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to VirtualBox

  1. unknown says:

    What is the difference between Fedora and Ubuntu in Linux?

  2. Manikandan S says:

    Thanks for your comment ๐Ÿ™‚

    Now to answer your question, the main difference would be the artwork or the interface, which is very glossy and catchy in Fedora.

    Besides using for general computing, Fedora is also used for application development and testing, whereas Ubuntu is more inclined towards end user computing, or to be more precise, for common computing needs.

    From the information I got from the internet, Fedora is not so stable as compared to Ubuntu(Source: Ubuntu Forum). And also, the application and package manager available in Ubuntu is better compared to that of Fedora.

    Hope I answered your question. ๐Ÿ™‚

    • tigerbimmer says:

      Fedora is the “free” version of Redhat.
      It’s an “testbed” for the new stuff.

      It’s also based on *.rpm package, where Ubuntu is based on Debian and *.deb package format.

      I agree that Ubuntu/Debian have way better package manager.

      • Manikandan S says:

        @tigerbimmer : Thanks for your comment. Yeah, you’re right. I forgot to mention the packages. ๐Ÿ™‚

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s